Clinical significance of VEGFR-2 and 18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax pretreatment score in predicting the long-term outcome of patients with locally advanced rectal …

CV Sole, FA Calvo, E Alvarez, I Peligros… - European journal of …, 2013 - Springer
CV Sole, FA Calvo, E Alvarez, I Peligros, P Garcia-Alfonso, C Ferrer, E Ochoa, R Herranz…
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2013Springer
Purpose Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), epidermal growth factor
receptor-1 (EGFR), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) stimulate key processes involved in
tumor progression and are important targets for cancer drugs. 18 F-FDG maximum
standardized uptake value (SUVmax) is a marker of tumor metabolic activity. The purpose of
this study was to measure SUVmax combined with VEGFR-2, EGFR and COX-2 proteins in
pretreatment tumor biopsies from patients with locally advanced rectal cancer receiving …
Purpose
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), epidermal growth factor receptor-1 (EGFR), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) stimulate key processes involved in tumor progression and are important targets for cancer drugs. 18F-FDG maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) is a marker of tumor metabolic activity. The purpose of this study was to measure SUVmax combined with VEGFR-2, EGFR and COX-2 proteins in pretreatment tumor biopsies from patients with locally advanced rectal cancer receiving intensive neoadjuvant treatment and to correlate the findings with clinical outcome.
Methods
VEGFR-2, EGFR and COX-2 were measured using the immunoreactive score (IRS). SUVmax (median 8.4) was quantified in tumors with molecular overexpression (IRS ≥3 + SUVmax ≥ 8.4 indicating active tumors; SUVmax <8.4 indicating inactive tumors). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to explore associations between tumor markers, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results
The study group comprised 38 patients with a median follow-up of 69.3 months (range 4.5 – 92 months). Multivariate analysis showed that active tumors (overexpressing VEGFR-2, high SUVmax) were associated with worse DFS (HR 4.73, 95 % CI 1.18  – 22.17; p = 0.04) and OS (HR 4.28, 95 % CI 1.04 – 20.12; p = 0.05).
Conclusion
Active tumors overexpressing VEGFR-2 are associated with a worse overall outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with induction chemotherapy followed by pelvic chemoradiation and surgery. The optimal diagnostic cut-off level for this novel biomarker association should be investigated. Evaluation in a clinical trial is required to determine whether selected patients could benefit from a VEGFR-targeting drug.
Springer