The Epidemiology of Community-AcquiredClostridium difficileInfection: A Population-Based Study

S Khanna, DS Pardi, SL Aronson… - Official journal of the …, 2012 - journals.lww.com
S Khanna, DS Pardi, SL Aronson, PP Kammer, R Orenstein, JL St Sauver, SW Harmsen…
Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology| ACG, 2012journals.lww.com
OBJECTIVES: Clostridium difficileinfection (CDI) is a common hospital-acquired infection
with increasing incidence, severity, recurrence, and associated morbidity and mortality.
There are emerging data on the occurrence of CDI in nonhospitalized patients. However,
there is a relative lack of community-based CDI studies, as most of the existing studies are
hospital based, potentially influencing the results by referral or hospitalization bias by
missing cases of community-acquired CDI. METHODS: To better understand the …
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
Clostridium difficileinfection (CDI) is a common hospital-acquired infection with increasing incidence, severity, recurrence, and associated morbidity and mortality. There are emerging data on the occurrence of CDI in nonhospitalized patients. However, there is a relative lack of community-based CDI studies, as most of the existing studies are hospital based, potentially influencing the results by referral or hospitalization bias by missing cases of community-acquired CDI.
METHODS:
To better understand the epidemiology of community-acquiredC. difficileinfection, a population-based study was conducted in Olmsted County, Minnesota, using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Data regarding severity, treatment response, and outcomes were compared in community-acquired vs. hospital-acquired cohorts, and changes in these parameters, as well as in incidence, were assessed over the study period.
RESULTS:
Community-acquired CDI cases accounted for 41% of 385 definite CDI cases. The incidence of both community-acquired and hospital-acquired CDI increased significantly over the study period. Compared with those with hospital-acquired infection, patients with community-acquired infection were younger (median age 50 years compared with 72 years), more likely to be female (76% vs. 60%), had lower comorbidity scores, and were less likely to have severe infection (20% vs. 31%) or have been exposed to antibiotics (78% vs. 94%). There were no differences in the rates of complicated or recurrent infection in patients with community-acquired compared with hospital-acquired infection.
CONCLUSIONS:
In this population-based cohort, a significant proportion of cases of CDI occurred in the community. These patients were younger and had less severe infection than those with hospital-acquired infection. Thus, reports of CDI in hospitalized patients likely underestimate the burden of disease and overestimate severity.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins