OCTET‐CY: a phase II study to investigate the efficacy of post‐transplant cyclophosphamide as sole graft‐versus‐host prophylaxis after allogeneic peripheral blood …

U Holtick, JM Chemnitz… - European journal of …, 2016 - Wiley Online Library
U Holtick, JM Chemnitz, A Shimabukuro‐Vornhagen, S Theurich, G Chakupurakal, A Krause…
European journal of haematology, 2016Wiley Online Library
Objective Post‐transplant cyclophosphamide is increasingly used as graft‐versus‐host
disease (Gv HD) prophylaxis in the setting of bone marrow transplantation. No data have
been published on the use of single‐agent Gv HD prophylaxis with post‐transplant
cyclophosphamide in the setting of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT).
Methods In a phase II trial, 11 patients with myeloma or lymphoma underwent conditioning
with fludarabine and busulfan followed by T‐replete PBSCT and application of 50 mg/kg/d of …
Objective
Post‐transplant cyclophosphamide is increasingly used as graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in the setting of bone marrow transplantation. No data have been published on the use of single‐agent GvHD prophylaxis with post‐transplant cyclophosphamide in the setting of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT).
Methods
In a phase II trial, 11 patients with myeloma or lymphoma underwent conditioning with fludarabine and busulfan followed by T‐replete PBSCT and application of 50 mg/kg/d of cyclophosphamide on day+3 and +4 without other concurrent immunosuppression (IS).
Results
Median time to leukocyte, neutrophil, and platelet engraftment was 18, 21, and 18 d. The incidence of grade II–IV and grade III–IV GvHD was 45% and 27%, with a non‐relapse mortality (NRM) of 36% at one and 2 yr. After median follow‐up of 927 d, overall and relapse‐free survival was 64% and 34%. Three patients did not require any further systemic IS until day+100 and thereafter. Analysis of immune reconstitution demonstrated rapid T‐ and NK‐cell recovery. B‐ and CD3+/CD161+NK/T‐cell recovery was superior in patients not receiving additional IS.
Conclusion
Post‐transplant cyclophosphamide as sole IS in PBSCT is feasible and allows rapid immune recovery. Increased rates of severe acute GvHD explain the observed NRM and may advise a temporary combination partner such as mTor‐inhibitors in the PBSCT setting.
Wiley Online Library