Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for recurrence-free survival after complete surgical resection of localised primary gastrointestinal stromal …

JS Gold, M Gönen, A Gutiérrez, JM Broto… - The lancet …, 2009 - thelancet.com
JS Gold, M Gönen, A Gutiérrez, JM Broto, X García-del-Muro, TC Smyrk, RG Maki, S Singer…
The lancet oncology, 2009thelancet.com
Background Adjuvant imatinib mesylate prolongs recurrence-free survival (RFS) after
resection of localised primary gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). We aimed to develop
a nomogram to predict RFS after surgery in the absence of adjuvant therapy to help guide
patient selection for adjuvant imatinib therapy. Methods A nomogram to predict RFS based
on tumour size (cm), location (stomach, small intestine, colon/rectum, or other), and mitotic
index (< 5 or≥ 5 mitoses per 50 high-power fields) was developed from 127 patients treated …
Background
Adjuvant imatinib mesylate prolongs recurrence-free survival (RFS) after resection of localised primary gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). We aimed to develop a nomogram to predict RFS after surgery in the absence of adjuvant therapy to help guide patient selection for adjuvant imatinib therapy.
Methods
A nomogram to predict RFS based on tumour size (cm), location (stomach, small intestine, colon/rectum, or other), and mitotic index (<5 or ≥5 mitoses per 50 high-power fields) was developed from 127 patients treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY, USA. The nomogram was tested in patients from the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS; n=212) and the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA (Mayo; n=148). The nomogram was assessed by calculating concordance probabilities and testing calibration of predicted RFS with observed RFS. Concordance probabilities were also compared with those of three commonly used staging systems.
Findings
The nomogram had a concordance probability of 0·78 (SE 0·02) in the MSKCC dataset, and 0·76 (0·03) and 0·80 (0·02) in the validation cohorts. Nomogram predictions were well calibrated. Inclusion of tyrosine kinase mutation status in the nomogram did not improve its discriminatory ability. Concordance probabilities of the nomogram were better than those of the two NIH staging systems (0·76 [0·03] vs 0·70 [0·04, p=0·04] and 0·66 [0·04, p=0·01] in the GEIS validation cohort; 0·80 [0·02] vs 0·74 [0·02, p=0·04] and 0·78 [0·02, p=0·05] in the Mayo cohort) and similar to those of the AFIP-Miettinen staging system (0·76 [0·03] vs 0·73 [0·004, p=0·28] in the GEIS cohort; 0·80 [0·02] vs 0·76 [0·003, p=0·09] in the Mayo cohort). Nomogram predictions of RFS seemed better calibrated than predictions made with the AFIP-Miettinen system.
Interpretation
The nomogram accurately predicts RFS after resection of localised primary GIST and could be used to select patients for adjuvant imatinib therapy.
Funding
National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
thelancet.com