Dual effect of the macrophage migration inhibitory factor gene on the development and severity of human systemic lupus erythematosus

A Sreih, R Ezzeddine, L Leng, A LaChance… - Arthritis & …, 2011 - Wiley Online Library
A Sreih, R Ezzeddine, L Leng, A LaChance, G Yu, Y Mizue, L Subrahmanyan…
Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2011Wiley Online Library
Objective To study the effect of the innate cytokine macrophage migration inhibitory factor
(MIF) on the susceptibility and severity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a
multinational population of 1,369 Caucasian and African American patients. Methods Two
functional polymorphisms in the MIF gene, a− 794 CATT5–8 microsatellite repeat
(rs5844572) and a− 173 G/C single‐nucleotide polymorphism (rs755622), were assessed
for association with SLE in 3,195 patients and healthy controls. We also measured MIF …
Objective
To study the effect of the innate cytokine macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) on the susceptibility and severity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a multinational population of 1,369 Caucasian and African American patients.
Methods
Two functional polymorphisms in the MIF gene, a −794 CATT5–8 microsatellite repeat (rs5844572) and a −173 G/C single‐nucleotide polymorphism (rs755622), were assessed for association with SLE in 3,195 patients and healthy controls. We also measured MIF plasma levels in relation to genotypes and clinical phenotypes, and assessed Toll‐like receptor 7 (TLR‐7)–stimulated MIF production in vitro.
Results
Both Caucasians and African Americans with the high‐expression MIF haplotype −794 CATT7/−173*C had a lower incidence of SLE (in Caucasians, odds ratio [OR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.53–0.89, P = 0.001; in African Americans, OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23–0.95, P = 0.012). In contrast, among patients with established SLE, reduced frequencies of low‐expression MIF genotypes (−794 CATT5) were observed in those with nephritis, those with serositis, and those with central nervous system (CNS) involvement when compared to patients without end‐organ involvement (P = 0.023, P = 0.005, and P = 0.04, respectively). Plasma MIF levels and TLR‐7–stimulated MIF production in vitro reflected the underlying MIF genotype of the studied groups.
Conclusion
These findings suggest that MIF, which has both proinflammatory properties and macrophage and B cell survival functions, exerts a dual influence on the immunopathogenesis of SLE. High‐expression MIF genotypes are associated with a reduced susceptibility to SLE and may contribute to an enhanced clearance of infectious pathogens. Once SLE develops, however, low‐expression MIF genotypes may protect from ensuing inflammatory end‐organ damage.
Wiley Online Library