Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the US: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry

KM Miller, NC Foster, RW Beck, RM Bergenstal… - Diabetes …, 2015 - Am Diabetes Assoc
KM Miller, NC Foster, RW Beck, RM Bergenstal, SN DuBose, LA DiMeglio, DM Maahs
Diabetes care, 2015Am Diabetes Assoc
To examine the overall state of metabolic control and current use of advanced diabetes
technologies in the US, we report recent data collected on individuals with type 1 diabetes
participating in the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Data from 16,061 participants updated
between 1 September 2013 and 1 December 2014 were compared with registry enrollment
data collected from 1 September 2010 to 1 August 2012. Mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
was assessed by year of age from< 4 to> 75 years. The overall average HbA1c was 8.2%(66 …
To examine the overall state of metabolic control and current use of advanced diabetes technologies in the U.S., we report recent data collected on individuals with type 1 diabetes participating in the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Data from 16,061 participants updated between 1 September 2013 and 1 December 2014 were compared with registry enrollment data collected from 1 September 2010 to 1 August 2012. Mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was assessed by year of age from <4 to >75 years. The overall average HbA1c was 8.2% (66 mmol/mol) at enrollment and 8.4% (68 mmol/mol) at the most recent update. During childhood, mean HbA1c decreased from 8.3% (67 mmol/mol) in 2–4-year-olds to 8.1% (65 mmol/mol) at 7 years of age, followed by an increase to 9.2% (77 mmol/mol) in 19-year-olds. Subsequently, mean HbA1c values decline gradually until ∼30 years of age, plateauing at 7.5–7.8% (58–62 mmol/mol) beyond age 30 until a modest drop in HbA1c below 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) in those 65 years of age. Severe hypoglycemia (SH) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) remain all too common complications of treatment, especially in older (SH) and younger patients (DKA). Insulin pump use increased slightly from enrollment (58–62%), and use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) did not change (7%). Although the T1D Exchange registry findings are not population based and could be biased, it is clear that there remains considerable room for improving outcomes of treatment of type 1 diabetes across all age-groups. Barriers to more effective use of current treatments need to be addressed and new therapies are needed to achieve optimal metabolic control in people with type 1 diabetes.
Am Diabetes Assoc