[HTML][HTML] Modeling the Effects of Vorinostat In Vivo Reveals both Transient and Delayed HIV Transcriptional Activation and Minimal Killing of Latently Infected Cells

R Ke, SR Lewin, JH Elliott, AS Perelson - PLoS pathogens, 2015 - journals.plos.org
PLoS pathogens, 2015journals.plos.org
Recent efforts to cure human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection have focused
on developing latency reversing agents as a first step to eradicate the latent reservoir. The
histone deacetylase inhibitor, vorinostat, has been shown to activate HIV RNA transcription
in CD4+ T-cells and alter host cell gene transcription in HIV-infected individuals on
antiretroviral therapy. In order to understand how latently infected cells respond dynamically
to vorinostat treatment and determine the impact of vorinostat on reservoir size in vivo, we …
Recent efforts to cure human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection have focused on developing latency reversing agents as a first step to eradicate the latent reservoir. The histone deacetylase inhibitor, vorinostat, has been shown to activate HIV RNA transcription in CD4+ T-cells and alter host cell gene transcription in HIV-infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy. In order to understand how latently infected cells respond dynamically to vorinostat treatment and determine the impact of vorinostat on reservoir size in vivo, we have constructed viral dynamic models of latency that incorporate vorinostat treatment. We fitted these models to data collected from a recent clinical trial in which vorinostat was administered daily for 14 days to HIV-infected individuals on suppressive ART. The results show that HIV transcription is increased transiently during the first few hours or days of treatment and that there is a delay before a sustained increase of HIV transcription, whose duration varies among study participants and may depend on the long term impact of vorinostat on host gene expression. Parameter estimation suggests that in latently infected cells, HIV transcription induced by vorinostat occurs at lower levels than in productively infected cells. Furthermore, the estimated loss rate of transcriptionally induced cells remains close to baseline in most study participants, suggesting vorinostat treatment does not induce latently infected cell killing and thus reduce the latent reservoir in vivo.
PLOS