Lineage-specific combinatorial action of enhancers regulates mouse erythroid Gata1 expression

R Drissen, B Guyot, L Zhang… - Blood, The Journal …, 2010 - ashpublications.org
R Drissen, B Guyot, L Zhang, A Atzberger, J Sloane-Stanley, B Wood, C Porcher, P Vyas
Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology, 2010ashpublications.org
Precise spatiotemporal control of Gata1 expression is required in both early hematopoietic
progenitors to determine erythroid/megakaryocyte versus granulocyte/monocyte lineage
output and in the subsequent differentiation of erythroid cells and megakaryocytes. An
enhancer element upstream of the mouse Gata1 IE (1st exon erythroid) promoter, mHS− 3.5,
can direct both erythroid and megakaryocytic expression. However, loss of this element
ablates only megakaryocytes, implying that an additional element has erythroid specificity …
Abstract
Precise spatiotemporal control of Gata1 expression is required in both early hematopoietic progenitors to determine erythroid/megakaryocyte versus granulocyte/monocyte lineage output and in the subsequent differentiation of erythroid cells and megakaryocytes. An enhancer element upstream of the mouse Gata1 IE (1st exon erythroid) promoter, mHS−3.5, can direct both erythroid and megakaryocytic expression. However, loss of this element ablates only megakaryocytes, implying that an additional element has erythroid specificity. Here, we identify a double DNaseI hypersensitive site, mHS−25/6, as having erythroid but not megakaryocytic activity in primary cells. It binds an activating transcription factor complex in erythroid cells where it also makes physical contact with the Gata1 promoter. Deletion of mHS−25/6 or mHS−3.5 in embryonic stem cells has only a modest effect on in vitro erythroid differentiation, whereas loss of both elements ablates both primitive and definitive erythropoiesis with an almost complete loss of Gata1 expression. Surprisingly, Gata2 expression was also concomitantly low, suggesting a more complex interaction between these 2 factors than currently envisaged. Thus, whereas mHS−3.5 alone is sufficient for megakaryocytic development, mHS−3.5 and mHS−25/6 collectively regulate erythroid Gata1 expression, demonstrating lineage-specific differences in Gata1 cis-element use important for development of these 2 cell types.
ashpublications.org