Type of SCN5A mutation determines clinical severity and degree of conduction slowing in loss-of-function sodium channelopathies

PG Meregalli, HL Tan, V Probst, TT Koopmann… - Heart Rhythm, 2009 - Elsevier
PG Meregalli, HL Tan, V Probst, TT Koopmann, MW Tanck, ZA Bhuiyan, F Sacher, F Kyndt…
Heart Rhythm, 2009Elsevier
BACKGROUND: Patients carrying loss-of-function SCN5A mutations linked to Brugada
syndrome (BrS) or progressive cardiac conduction disease (PCCD) are at risk of sudden
cardiac death at a young age. The penetrance and expressivity of the disease are highly
variable, and new tools for risk stratification are needed. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to
establish whether the type of SCN5A mutation correlates with the clinical and
electrocardiographic phenotype. METHODS: We studied BrS or PCCD probands and their …
BACKGROUND
Patients carrying loss-of-function SCN5A mutations linked to Brugada syndrome (BrS) or progressive cardiac conduction disease (PCCD) are at risk of sudden cardiac death at a young age. The penetrance and expressivity of the disease are highly variable, and new tools for risk stratification are needed.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to establish whether the type of SCN5A mutation correlates with the clinical and electrocardiographic phenotype.
METHODS
We studied BrS or PCCD probands and their relatives who carried a SCN5A mutation. Mutations were divided into 2 main groups: missense mutations (M) or mutations leading to premature truncation of the protein (T). The M group was subdivided according to available biophysical properties: M mutations with ≤90% (Mactive) or >90% (Minactive) peak INa reduction were analyzed separately.
RESULTS
The study group was composed of 147 individuals with 32 different mutations. No differences in age and sex distribution were found between the groups. Subjects carrying a T mutation had significantly more syncopes than those with an Mactive mutation (19 of 75 versus 2 of 35, P = .03). Also, mutations associated with drastic peak INa reduction (T and Minactive mutants) had a significantly longer PR interval, compared with Mactive mutations. All other electrocardiographic parameters were comparable. After drug provocation testing, both PR and QRS intervals were significantly longer in the T and Minactive groups than in the Mactive group.
CONCLUSION
In loss-of-function SCN5A channelopathies, patients carrying T and Minactive mutations develop a more severe phenotype than those with Mactive mutations. This is associated with more severe conduction disorders. This is the first time that genetic data are proposed for risk stratification in BrS.
Elsevier