The Use of the Internal Perimeter to Compare Airway Size and to Calculate Smooth Muscle Shortening1-3

AL James, JC Hogg, LA Dunn, PD Paré - Am Rev Respir Dis, 1988 - atsjournals.org
AL James, JC Hogg, LA Dunn, PD Paré
Am Rev Respir Dis, 1988atsjournals.org
Previous studies from our laboratory suggest that the internal airway perimeter (Pi) defined
by the folded epithelial surface remains constant as the airways narrow. Totest this
hypothesis, we treated adjacent slices of resected lung lobes with either theophylline or
carbachol and determined the dimensions of the airways in these lung slices. Transverse
sections of contracted (n= 58) and relaxed (n= 55) airways were used to measure the Pi
defined by the epithelial surface, lumen area (Ai), external perimeter (Pe) defined by the …
Summary
Previous studies from our laboratory suggest that the internal airway perimeter (Pi) defined by the folded epithelial surface remains constant as the airways narrow. Totest this hypothesis, we treated adjacent slices of resected lung lobes with either theophylline or carbachol and determined the dimensions of the airways in these lung slices. Transverse sections of contracted (n=
58) and relaxed (n= 55) airways were used to measure the Pi defined by the epithelial surface, lumen area (Ai), external perimeter (Pe) defined by the outer edge of the smooth muscle layer, and the external area (Ae). Wall area (WA= Ae-Ai) was calculated. The frequency distribution of internal perimeters was not significantly different for the contracted and relaxed airways, and when the square root of wall area was plolted against Pi, the regression lines for the contracted and relaxed airways were almost identical. The" relaxed" external perimeter was calculated Per= VPi'+(41l WA), and the percentage of muscle shortening (PMS) was determined: PMS=
ATS Journals