Sst2, a Negative Regulator of Pheromone Signaling in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Expression, Localization, and Genetic Interaction and Physical …

HG Dohlman, J Song, D Ma… - … and cellular biology, 1996 - Taylor & Francis
HG Dohlman, J Song, D Ma, WE Courchesne, J Thorner
Molecular and cellular biology, 1996Taylor & Francis
Sst2 is the prototype for the newly recognized RGS (for regulators of G-protein signaling)
family. Cells lacking the pheromone-inducible SST2 gene product fail to resume growth after
exposure to pheromone. Conversely, overproduction of Sst2 markedly enhanced the rate of
recovery from pheromone-induced arrest in the long-term halo bioassay and detectably
dampened signaling in a short-term assay of pheromone response (phosphorylation of Ste4,
Gβ subunit). When the GPA1 gene product (Gα subunit) is absent, the pheromone response …
Sst2 is the prototype for the newly recognized RGS (for regulators of G-protein signaling) family. Cells lacking the pheromone-inducible SST2 gene product fail to resume growth after exposure to pheromone. Conversely, overproduction of Sst2 markedly enhanced the rate of recovery from pheromone-induced arrest in the long-term halo bioassay and detectably dampened signaling in a short-term assay of pheromone response (phosphorylation of Ste4, Gβ subunit). When the GPA1 gene product (Gα subunit) is absent, the pheromone response pathway is constitutively active and, consequently, growth ceases. Despite sustained induction of Sst2 (observed with specific anti-Sst2 antibodies), gpa1Δ mutants remain growth arrested, indicating that the action of Sst2 requires the presence of Gpa1. The N-terminal domain (residues 3 to 307) of Sst2 (698 residues) has sequence similarity to the catalytic regions of bovine GTPase-activating protein and human neurofibromatosis tumor suppressor protein; segments in the C-terminal domain of Sst2 (between residues 417 and 685) are homologous to other RGS proteins. Both the N- and C-terminal domains were required for Sst2 function in vivo. Consistent with a role for Sst2 in binding to and affecting the activity of Gpa1, the majority of Sst2 was membrane associated and colocalized with Gpa1 at the plasma membrane, as judged by sucrose density gradient fractionation. Moreover, from cell extracts, Sst2 could be isolated in a complex with Gpa1 (expressed as a glutathione S-transferase fusion); this association withstood the detergent and salt conditions required for extraction of these proteins from cell membranes. Also, SST2+ cells expressing a GTPase-defective GPA1 mutant displayed an increased sensitivity to pheromone, whereas sst2 cells did not. These results demonstrate that Sst2 and Gpa1 interact physically and suggest that Sst2 is a direct negative regulator of Gpa1.
Taylor & Francis Online