II. Validity and reliability of liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection for measuring plasma levels of norepinephrine and epinephrine in man

DS Goldstein, G Feuerstein, JL Izzo Jr, IJ Kopin… - Life sciences, 1981 - Elsevier
DS Goldstein, G Feuerstein, JL Izzo Jr, IJ Kopin, HR Keiser
Life sciences, 1981Elsevier
Liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (LCEC) provides a rapid, sensitive,
and specific technique for measuring human plasma norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine
(E) levels. We tested the reliability and validity of this technique against that of the catechol-
O-methyl-transferase radioenzymatic (COMT-RE) assay. In healthy, resting humans, mean
NE and E values were similar using the LCEC and COMT-RE techniques (311 vs. 300 pg/ml
for NE; 57 vs. 52 pg/ml for E). In a series of 25 plasma samples obtained from a variety of …
Abstract
Liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (LCEC) provides a rapid, sensitive, and specific technique for measuring human plasma norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E) levels. We tested the reliability and validity of this technique against that of the catechol-O-methyl-transferase radioenzymatic (COMT-RE) assay. In healthy, resting humans, mean NE and E values were similar using the LCEC and COMT-RE techniques (311 vs. 300 pg/ml for NE; 57 vs. 52 pg/ml for E). In a series of 25 plasma samples obtained from a variety of sources, the correlation between the two methods was 0.99 for both NE and E. Coefficients of variation were similar for catecholamine levels above 100 pg/ml, but below this, the COMT-RE technique appeared to be more reliable. The advantages of the LCEC method are its speed, simplicity of sample preparation, low cost per assay, lack of use of radionuclides, and ease in trouble-shooting. The COMT-RE technique is preferable for small sample sizes or large numbers of samples. LCEC offers a reasonable alternative to the COMT-RE technique for measuring plasma norepineprhine and epinephrine.
Elsevier