[HTML][HTML] Two phase 3 trials of adalimumab for hidradenitis suppurativa

AB Kimball, MM Okun, DA Williams… - … England Journal of …, 2016 - Mass Medical Soc
AB Kimball, MM Okun, DA Williams, AB Gottlieb, KA Papp, CC Zouboulis, AW Armstrong
New England Journal of Medicine, 2016Mass Medical Soc
Background Hidradenitis suppurativa is a painful, chronic inflammatory skin disease with
few options for effective treatment. In a phase 2 trial, adalimumab, an antibody against tumor
necrosis factor α, showed efficacy against hidradenitis suppurativa. Methods PIONEER I and
II were similarly designed, phase 3 multicenter trials of adalimumab for hidradenitis
suppurativa, with two double-blind, placebo-controlled periods. In period 1, patients were
randomly assigned in a 1: 1 ratio to 40 mg of adalimumab weekly or matching placebo for 12 …
Background
Hidradenitis suppurativa is a painful, chronic inflammatory skin disease with few options for effective treatment. In a phase 2 trial, adalimumab, an antibody against tumor necrosis factor α, showed efficacy against hidradenitis suppurativa.
Methods
PIONEER I and II were similarly designed, phase 3 multicenter trials of adalimumab for hidradenitis suppurativa, with two double-blind, placebo-controlled periods. In period 1, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 40 mg of adalimumab weekly or matching placebo for 12 weeks. In period 2, patients were reassigned to adalimumab at a weekly or every-other-week dose or to placebo for 24 weeks. The primary end point was a clinical response, defined as at least a 50% reduction from baseline in the abscess and inflammatory-nodule count, with no increase in abscess or draining-fistula counts, at week 12.
Results
We enrolled 307 patients in PIONEER I and 326 in PIONEER II. Clinical response rates at week 12 were significantly higher for the groups receiving adalimumab weekly than for the placebo groups: 41.8% versus 26.0% in PIONEER I (P=0.003) and 58.9% versus 27.6% in PIONEER II (P<0.001). Patients receiving adalimumab had significantly greater improvement than the placebo groups in rank-ordered secondary outcomes (lesions, pain, and the modified Sartorius score for disease severity) at week 12 in PIONEER II only. Serious adverse events in period 1 (excluding worsening of underlying disease) occurred in 1.3% of patients receiving adalimumab and 1.3% of those receiving placebo in PIONEER I and in 1.8% and 3.7% of patients, respectively, in PIONEER II. In period 2, the rates of serious adverse events were 4.6% or less in all the groups in both studies, with no significant between-group differences.
Conclusions
Treatment with adalimumab (40 mg weekly), as compared with placebo, resulted in significantly higher clinical response rates in both trials at 12 weeks; rates of serious adverse events were similar in the study groups. (Funded by AbbVie; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01468207 and NCT01468233 for PIONEER I and PIONEER II, respectively.)
The New England Journal Of Medicine