Remote measurements of body temperature (T_b) in animals require implantation of relatively large temperature-sensitive radio-transmitters or data loggers, whereas rectal temperature (T_rec) measurements require handling and therefore may bias the results. We investigated whether ∼0.1g temperature-sensitive subcutaneously implanted transponders can be reliably used to quantify thermal biology and torpor use in small mammals. We examined (i) the precision of transponder readings as a function of temperature and (ii) whether subcutaneous transponders can be used to remotely record subcutaneous temperature (T_sub). Five adult male dunnarts (Sminthopsis macroura, body mass 24g) were implanted with subcutaneous transponders to determine T_sub as a function of time and ambient temperature (T_a), and in comparison to thermocouple readings of T_rec. Transponder temperature was highly correlated with water bath temperature (r²=0.96–0.99) over a range of approximately 10.0–40.0°C. Transponders provided reliable data (±0.6°C) over the T_sub of 21.4–36.9°C and could be read from a distance of up to 5cm. Below 21.4°C, accuracy was reduced to ±2.8°C, but individual transponder accuracy varied. Consequently, small subcutaneous transponders are useful to remotely quantify thermal physiology and torpor patterns without having to disturb the animal and disrupt torpor. Even at T_sub<21.4°C where the accuracy of the temperature readings was reduced, transponders do provide reliable data on whether and when torpor is used.